Staying Close to Yourself in a Chaotic World

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

The world is restless and chaotic. How do you deal with that without losing yourself?

Column: Is global chaos the new normal? - Los Angeles Times

Unrest is the new norm

The world has been restless for decades, of course, especially if you regularly check the news. But two foundations under our societies are changing faster and faster: technology and ecology.

Technology is improving at an exponential rate – the ecology is actually deteriorating faster and more visibly.

It creates a lot of turmoil in the world – and then in ourselves . Because the acceleration of these two factors, among others, leads to enormous economic and geopolitical changes and crises that we see unfolding before our eyes.

Violent developments seem to follow each other in rapid succession. It sometimes feels like we’ll never get ‘a break’ from just living our lives.

We are no longer in an era of change but in a change of era .

We have left the relatively stable ‘post-war’ world behind us. We are now well on our way to a new balance. And in the meantime we experience chaos, turmoil and uncertainty .

Exciting – even scary at times – and incredibly insecure. What do we do with that?

2,348 Chaotic World Stock Photos, Pictures & Royalty-Free Images - iStock

1. Bring it back to yourself

No matter what’s happening in the world – you still have to load the dishwasher. And as far as I’m concerned, this is a great way to look at the situation.

You usually have virtually no control over world events . We are here with billions of people of which you are only one.

What can you do about a pandemic? What can you do about wars, about climate change?

There are always steps you can (and maybe should) take. But your influence is always limited. And it’s important to realize that.

You don’t have to save the world . And you can’t save the world. It’s not just your world – it belongs to all of us. It is therefore also our joint responsibility.

What can you do if you feel overwhelmed by world events? Here are things that work well for me – and many blogzynergy.com readers:

  • Stop constantly checking the news and social media. This prevents your brain from endlessly ‘chewing’ on issues that your brain can’t possibly solve. This reduces the feeling of restlessness, stress and powerlessness.
  • Rather choose to take the state of affairs in one go with some regularity. For example, by reading one newspaper or watching the news once.
  • Write in your journal about the things that make you restless. Write your thoughts on paper and describe your feelings. That way they don’t keep circulating in your head all the time.
  • Also immediately write down all the little things you are grateful for . That immediately gives more shine to your day.
  • Take a moment to “be mindful” of your feelings of insecurity, fear, and anxiety. Observe the sensation in your body without changing anything. Just let this feeling last for a while without running away. This gives the unrest the opportunity to ‘burn out’, after which you immediately feel calmer.
  • Investigate which practical steps you can actually take to make the situation better or less undesirable . Such as making your lifestyle more sustainable, cultivating compassion and taking the necessary measures.
  • Focus your attention on taking those steps. Action reduces anxiety . Do what needs to be done and you’ll feel better right away.
  • Practice rational fatalism . What has happened cannot be undone – even if it should never have happened. It is what it is – even if you mentally resist it. Fighting reality is always stressful . By accepting the current situation, you create a new starting point from which you can take your next step.
  • Try to focus your attention on the moment. Practice mindfulness , meditate, exercise, seek distraction. Do you tend to worry a lot? Then opt for physical activities. Such as working in the garden, cleaning, tidying up or helping someone else in the house.

Breathe in slowly and relax completely. The restlessness of the world need not make you restless . It is possible and allowed, but it is not necessary. You don’t control what happens around you – but you can control how you deal with it.

By making it clear to yourself what you do have control over, you will quickly reduce anxiety. Make your world smaller again and focus on practical steps.

2. Stay close to yourself

What do you think is important? Which values ​​would you like to ‘live’? What do you want to stand for?

When we feel anxious, we quickly withdraw into a defensive position. You may prefer to curl up with a nice series, a bag of chips and a comfortable dress.

I know I feel that tendency in myself!

That’s okay – but it’s probably not who you want to be. It’s not the life you face .

It takes courage to live your values ​​in exciting times. But you can practice with it step by step.

For instance:

  • Choose compassion where you would normally judge.
  • Choose love where you would choose fear.
  • Choose listening instead of giving advice.
  • Choose patience instead of presenting your opinion directly.
  • Choose generosity when you’d rather protect your stuff.
  • Choose calm breathing where you would normally fall back into restlessness.
  • Choose mindfulness where you would normally be distracted.

You’re going to fail at this all the time – that goes for all of us, including me. But it is valuable to stay close to yourself, especially in troubled times.

Because times will remain restless for the time being . So if you don’t do it now – when? Back straight, head up. Be brave and live in the way that satisfies you.

Move away from fear and anxiety . Live your values ​​– so you can inspire others to do the same.

3. Give the best of yourself

Whatever happens – tomorrow the sun will rise again. Life goes on.

You can easily be paralyzed by undesirable events in the world. But does that make sense if you can’t control it anyway?

You have a life to live . So just do what needs to be done.

Loading the dishwasher, for example. But also take care of yourself and – very important – take care of others. Because heaven and earth can tremble – we are only in real trouble when we lose sight of ourselves and each other.

If you feel anxious, then so do others. Perhaps you can offer a listening ear. Maybe you can cheer someone up. Maybe you can make someone else’s life a little easier or more fun.

Maybe together you can provide a welcome distraction from all the misery in the media.

You may ask yourself, “How can I contribute? How can I offer the most value right now?”

You cannot control the world. But you can choose to add a little more love, a little more attention and a little more compassion.

Because you know how it works: societies are made up of people. Trade fear for love, and you’ve actually made society a little more loving .

Inspire others by living your values ​​and your influence will increase even further.

The bigger the chaos, the simpler the solution:

  1. Keep breathing calmly;
  2. Focus on the next step;
  3. Ask yourself, “What would love do?”

Sounds cheesy, but that’s the way it is. It works – that’s especially important to me.

I hope I was able to make your day a little brighter with these handles . The world will not become less chaotic any time soon. So it’s up to us to find ways to stay close to ourselves – even when the waters are choppy.

Take it Easy! Control Yourself and your love ones.

KEEP CALM AND CONTROL YOURSELF - Keep Calm and Posters Generator, Maker For  Free - KeepCalmAndPosters.com
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Let us look at the Standpoint Theory

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Standpoint Theory: This article explains point of view theory, or Standpoint Theory, in a practical way. After reading you will understand the basics of this powerful theory of sociology.

Feminist Perspectives on the Social Sciences Philosophy 152


What is point of view theory?
The Feminist Standpoint Theory, also known as the feminist point of view theory or point of view epistemology, is a feminist theoretical perspective used in academic disciplines and argues that knowledge arises from social position.

The Standpoint Theory

The theory further states that authority is rooted in perspectives and personal knowledge of individuals and the power that comes from that knowledge.

How Chess Games Can End: 8 Ways Explained - Chess.com

The most important aspect of point of view theory is that an individual’s perspectives are shaped by his or her social and political experiences.
Definition Standpoint Theory
The standpoint theory describes a postmodernist perspective on people and knowledge distribution. The perspective denies that traditional science is objective and suggests that traditional research has ignored and marginalized women and feminist mindsets.

The Standpoint Theory stems from the Marxist argument that lower-class people do not have access to the type of knowledge that is accessible to higher-class people, described by Friedrich Engels.


Epistemology
Epistemology is the study of knowledge. Professionals who deal with this are called epistemologists. They are engaged in two tasks:

Determining the nature of knowledge Determining the
extent of human knowledge

Determining the nature of knowledge means: what does knowledge and knowing actually mean? What determines whether someone knows or does not know something? And what does it mean that someone has more or different knowledge than the other? These questions are about understanding knowledge.

Determining the extent of knowledge is an important secondary task for epistemologists. In order to determine this, they are concerned with the question of how much people know or could know.

How can the human mind, senses and resources be used to acquire knowledge? What boundaries are incorporating…

You may also want to read the following article:

Stay powered relaxed when you are busy 4-tips

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Let’s Talk About the Core Quadrant of Daniel Ofman

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Core Quadrant: This article explains Daniel Ofman ‘s core quadrant theory in a practical way. After reading you will understand the basics of this powerful and effective communication tool and you can get started with your core qualities.

Daniel OFman's model of core quadrants - DYON HOEKSTRA

Background core quadrant theory

Everyone can be annoyed by the behavior of others. We find others, such as certain colleagues, to be difficult and believe that someone should do their best to change their behaviour. But do “difficult” people really exist?

According to business expert Daniel Ofman , the answer is no! Does each person possess certain core qualities that can differ enormously from each other? According to Ofman, the answer is yes!

A big difference in this can cause certain friction between people. Ofman explains this principle in his book Inspiration and Quality in Organizations

What is a core quadrant

To gain more insight into these mutual relationships, Daniel Ofman developed various core quadrants that clarify why this friction arises in combination with which behaviour.

The model revolves around the four terms core quality, pitfall, challenge and allergy. These are qualities that a person can control and improve in the context of personal development and personal leadership.

A person’s core quality can be in direct opposition to the behavior to which he or she is allergic. Daniel Ofman then indicates how a core quality can turn into a pitfall and how he can take up the challenge to adjust his behaviour.

Core Quadrant Examples

The core quality is one’s natural positive quality, which is not learned. However, this strength of the personality can overshoot, turning the strength into a weakness. Every person has some of these core qualities. Example: punctual and tidy.

Pitfall

In the case of shooting, Daniel Ofman speaks of a pitfall, in which the property has a negative effect on the environment and also gets in the way of the person himself. Example: Perfectionist and over organized.

Every core quality has a sunny and a dark side. The shadow side could also be called distortion. The distortion is not the opposite of a core quality, but rather a core quality that goes too far and misses the mark.

For example, flexibility can turn into fickleness. When this is the case, flexibility suddenly becomes a weakness. In short, a pitfall can be described as too much of a good thing.

The pitfall is noticed before a core quality. Someone who is decisive can quickly be noticed as pushy.

Regardless of whether this is justified in some situations, this is simply part of the core qualities of this person. Core qualities and pitfalls are inextricably linked. It is important to ensure that the pitfalls do not occur too often.

Challenge

The positive opposite of the pitfall is the challenge, which is a good addition to the core quality. The challenge creates more balance. example: let the “things go” more often and learn to postpone.

The challenge is, as it were, a second gift in addition to owning the quality. The positive opposite of being pushy is being patient or reserved. Pitfalls and challenges are complementary processes.

It is about achieving a good balance between flexibility and consistency. If the balance tends too far towards flexibility, there is a chance that flexibility will turn into capriciousness.

In order not to fall into the trap, it is necessary to accept the challenge. A person who can analyze well should beware of the trap of indecision.

Allergy

The allergy is diametrically opposed to the core quality. When someone goes too far in his challenge that is linked to the core quality, there is a danger that the trait will degenerate into an allergy (extended form of someone’s challenge). Example: untidy and disorganized. In such a case Ofman speaks of an allergy.

A person’s pitfall is often the source of irritations or conflicts/tensions. This is especially if one person’s pitfall turns out to be someone else’s allergy as well.

The average person turns out to be allergic to the opposite of the core qualities. An allergy is therefore a character trait that someone with a certain core quality experiences as difficult.

An energetic person will tend not to handle passivity well; he or she is allergic to passivity. The more often someone is confronted with his own allergy by someone else, the greater the chance that he or she will end up in the trap.

A decisive person runs the risk of being pushy while accusing someone else of being passive. According to Daniel Ofman, you can learn a lot about yourself when you are annoyed by certain people.

With the formulation of the allergy, Daniel Ofman’s Core Quadrant is complete. In the quadrant, the connection between qualities, pitfalls, challenges and allergies quickly becomes clear.

The difference between qualities and skills

In the hiring process of many companies, terms such as qualities and skills are common. These two are often confused, but are fundamentally different.

Core qualities, as expressed with Ofman’s Core Quadrants, are characteristics that belong to the essence or core of a person.

They are personal. Personal qualities are the powers or strengths that people think of when they hear a certain name. Examples of core qualities are orderly, decisive, caring, diligent and more.

Core qualities are not behaviours, but rather possibilities to which one can be tuned. The same goes for broadcasting a live stream. The live stream is of good quality if there is a stable network connection in combination with properly working equipment. People also have qualities that can be tested.

Everyone is born with some core qualities, but that’s not all. Everyone is also born with a number of pitfalls, a challenge and an allergy.

The difference between qualities and skills is mainly made up of the fact that qualities come from within and skills are learned: nature vs. nurture. The clearer the image a person has of his own core qualities, the more consciously the qualities can be used and also which qualities.

Those who have strong perseverance know that they will function well in situations where the time span is stretched. They also know that persistence comes in handy in their lives, both professionally and privately.

Create Core Quadrant

Many people are allergic to the behavior of others for fear that this behavior is also hidden somewhere deep within themselves.

Besides that Daniel Ofman’s core quadrant provides insight into the actions of others, it also provides insight into one’s own actions. By applying the model, there is more understanding for each other and for different situations.

Ofman’s model can be applied personally or to groups / others. The core quadrant structures information about yourself and other people. It is important to fill in your own quadrant before using the method for or with someone else.

Always focus on the positive qualities (core qualities) of the other persons. This is a precondition for understanding, possible change and awareness. The application of the core quadrant creates more empathy for each other in different situations.

Keep in mind that some people fill out the personal quadrant based on how they want people to see them. There is therefore a risk of incorrect terms being used.

Always use nouns to describe the qualities of yourself and others, such as: perseverance, kindness, etc., and not pushy or obnoxious.

The core quadrant for insight into core qualities

By understanding personal different core qualities and pitfalls, it is also better to understand that a pitfall can be perceived by someone else as an allergy.

With self-insight, one discovers that a core quality sometimes goes too far, which can cause irritation in the environment. Below you will find a number of examples of core qualities and pitfalls:

  • Core quality: Perfectionist – pitfall: Mosquito sifter
  • Core quality: Helper – pitfall: Busy
  • Core quality: Successful worker – pitfall: Streber
  • Core quality: Romantic – pitfall: Drift head
  • Core quality: Observer – pitfall: Know-it-all
  • Core quality: Loyalist – pitfall: Slave
  • Core quality: Hedonist – pitfall: Party animal
  • Core quality: Leader – pitfall: Dictator
  • Core quality: Mediator – pitfall: Ruler cousin

Using core qualities in the workplace

Employees who can use their core qualities in the workplace are more involved, are less likely to leave, perform better and will benefit the company’s results. The best way for organizations to leverage employee strengths is through the managers.

The above facts come from a large Gallup study of human behavior and strengths. Employees who can leverage their strengths every day are six times more likely to be engaged in the work they do.

The research uncovers a compelling link between strengths and employee engagement in the workplace. This relationship has the potential to accelerate performance as organizations work to improve on both factors.

How do I develop my core qualities?

In addition to identifying and discovering core qualities, developing them is also very important.

The best way for people to grow and develop is to identify how they are naturally put together: how they think, feel and behave and what their talents are. They then build on those talents to develop strengths, or the ability to consistently deliver perfect performance.

The same Gallup research shows that building and developing employee strengths is far more effective at improving performance than at improving weaknesses.

As mentioned, the best way to do this is through the managers in the workplace. But in practice a lot goes wrong here.

A quarter of all American workers say their core skills are ignored in the workplace. Forty percent of that share indicates that they are even discouraged from using their qualities.

Focusing on employee strengths by a manager has a profound effect on employee engagement.

That’s because managers play an important role in maximizing the realization of these employees’ potential. It is the managers who can enable employees to capitalize on their strengths.

Tips for deploying the core qualities of employees

Below are some tips for effectively assessing, deploying and developing the strengths of employees.

Don’t assume that everyone knows their own strengths. Many people often take their greatest talents for granted or are not fully aware of their talent. Gallup ‘s  Clifton Strengthfinder can be used to identify strengths.

Find creative ways to apply strengths in ongoing projects to achieve common goals. Help employees get to know each other’s strengths and understand how they can complement each other.

Use meetings to help team members identify each other’s strengths.

Integrate the strengths of employees in the appraisal interviews, and help them set goals based on these strengths.

Summary core quadrant theory of Daniel Ofman

Daniel Ofman’s core quadrant theory is a valuable method to gain insight into the mutual relationships of people / employees. Mapping this out helps them in their personal development.

Specifically, it concerns employee behavior to which other employees are allergic. With difficult or deviant behavior people assume that the person is difficult himself. However, in fact, these behaviors more often stem from the pitfall of a certain core quality.

The model consists of several parts. The first is the core quality itself. This is a natural positive characteristic of someone. This can turn into a negative trait. This is called the pitfall of the natural core quality.

Every quality has such a dark side, but this is not always noticed. An example of this is flexibility turning into fickleness.

The challenge is the positive opposite of the pitfall. The challenge creates more balance between the dangers and forces of strong properties.

In the example of flexibility, the challenge creates a good balance between consistency and flexibility. If the balance threatens to move too far towards flexibility, there is a chance that flexibility will turn into capriciousness.

The last part of the model is the allergy. The allergy is diametrically opposed to the core quality. An example of this is passivity vs. proactive. A proactive person is likely to be allergic to passivity. A proactive person, in turn, can also be described as decisive and pushy when he tells others to be passive.

What do you think? Do you recognize the core qualities and the core quadrant in which behavior becomes visible? What is your experience, your challenge, your core quadrant and do you have any additions to the above? What do you think are success factors that can contribute to coping with certain behaviors to achieve goals?

Share your knowledge and experience via the comment box at the bottom of this article.

Developing Leaders: A Perspective Based on Ofman's Core Quality Model —  Harshman & Associates

Read also:

This way you get more energy every day in 2022…

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Greatest Powerful Kolb .’s Learning Styles

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Kolb Learning Styles: This article explains in a practical way David Kolb ‘s Kolb Learning Styles . After reading you will understand the basics of this powerful management tool .

Experiential learning: Learning with Practice – Mihir Valera

What are Kolb’s learning styles?

The American psychologist David Kolb , together with Roger Fry, developed a model for an effective learning process in the 1970s. This management model, the Experiential Learning Model (ELM), is cyclical and is also known in science as Kolb’s four learning styles.

Through Kolb’s four learning styles, which is also a learning circle, it becomes clear that there is not just one way of learning, but that there are several methods and that each individual has his own preferred learning style.

Diversity

David Kolb discovered that people tend to develop mainly the learning phase in which they are strong. According to him, it is good to also pay attention to ways of learning in which one is less good.

Such diversity allows the learning cycle to be completed in a more complete and balanced way, with each phase receiving equal attention.

A group has this diversity by nature, so that the group members complement each other automatically. Thus David Kolb came to understand Kolb’s four learning styles.

Dimensions

David Kolb distinguishes in his four learning styles model two dimensions with the opposites “Concrete versus Abstract” and “Active versus Reflective”.

In practice, it appears that adults (unlike children) depending on experience and stage of life, first have to unlearn something before they can learn something new. Sometimes (undesirable) experiences have to be processed before they are open to new insights.

What are Kolb’s four learning styles?

Within the dimensions, Kolb’s four learning styles are based on a theoretical model of four key steps. David Kolb distinguishes the behaviors and the corresponding learning styles:

Kolb .’s Learning Styles

Kolb's Learning Styles - toolshero

Kolb Learning Styles: This article explains in a practical way David Kolb ‘s Kolb Learning Styles . After reading you will understand the basics of this powerful management tool .

What are Kolb’s learning styles?

The American psychologist David Kolb , together with Roger Fry, developed a model for an effective learning process in the 1970s. This management model, the Experiential Learning Model (ELM), is cyclical and is also known in science as Kolb’s four learning styles.

Through Kolb’s four learning styles, which is also a learning circle, it becomes clear that there is not just one way of learning, but that there are several methods and that each individual has his own preferred learning style.

Diversity

David Kolb discovered that people tend to develop mainly the learning phase in which they are strong. According to him, it is good to also pay attention to ways of learning in which one is less good.

Such diversity allows the learning cycle to be completed in a more complete and balanced way, with each phase receiving equal attention.

A group has this diversity by nature, so that the group members complement each other automatically. Thus David Kolb came to understand Kolb’s four learning styles.

Dimensions

David Kolb distinguishes in his four learning styles model two dimensions with the opposites “Concrete versus Abstract” and “Active versus Reflective”.

In practice, it appears that adults (unlike children) depending on experience and stage of life, first have to unlearn something before they can learn something new. Sometimes (undesirable) experiences have to be processed before they are open to new insights.

What are Kolb’s four learning styles?

Within the dimensions, Kolb’s four learning styles are based on a theoretical model of four key steps. David Kolb distinguishes the behaviors and the corresponding learning styles:

Doer

This learning style shows a combination of active experimentation and concrete experience.

Doers prefer situations where they can get started as quickly as possible and learn best when there is room for direct experience by doing things.

Doers are open to new learning opportunities, are good at solving problems and find it a challenge to start on an unknown job.

Viewer

This learning style has a preference for concrete experience and reflective observation. Spectators like to think things through first and are champions of lateral problem solving.

They like to approach and look at a problem from all sides and see new entrances and solutions all the time. Spectators don’t want to be rushed and want to have time before making a decision.

Thinker

This learning style combines reflective observation with abstract conceptualization. Thinkers like to convert their observations into hypotheses and theories. They can reason well and like to work independently.

They learn best from structured situations with clear objectives, theories and models. They would like to have the opportunity to ask questions and discuss.

Decision maker

This learning style favors abstract conceptualization and active experimentation. Decision makers like to try theories in practice.

They often take initiative, are problem-solving and make decisions. They learn best from clearly and concisely formulated rules and principles, which they can apply right away. They are practitioners who don’t like wasting time.

Kolb’s learning styles are cyclical

Kolb’s learning styles is a cyclical process, in which all four stages of learning must be completed. This does not have to be done from the same starting point, but preferably in the same order.

Despite preference for a certain phase, according to David Kolb, the learning process becomes easier by going through all four learning phases.

Coherence

Until recently, in many study programs the emphasis was mainly on the assimilating learning style; reflection and theory building. They learned how certain things are related and how they can be seen in a theoretical framework.

Less attention was often paid to the accommodative learning style (experimentation and experience). By doing something, one gains experience (doer). Then one looks back at what exactly happened (the viewer).

After that, connections are made between these reflections and observations and a certain theory (thinker) is formed. Then people think about how something can be (even) better and will try it out in practice (decision maker). All-round learners master all four learning styles.

Develop yourself with Kolb’s learning styles

Personal development according to your own learning style

Many companies also suffer from the ‘one-size-fits-all syndrome’ in which copying behavior predominates and one employee can hardly be distinguished from another.

The result is clear: a lack of dynamism within the company. Every person is unique and goes through their own personal development.

That is why not only schools, but also organizations should focus much more on a personal learning style that ensures that every individual gets the best out of himself.

Learn in your own style

Get a group of people together and have them learn the same subject or skill. You will notice that everyone does this in their own way. Learning cannot be captured in one style.

Learning psychologist and educator David Kolb made a distinction between different learning styles and personalities.

David Kolb was based on doers, thinkers, dreamers and decision makers. They all go through different phases during the learning circle: concrete experience, observation and reflection, analysis and abstract thinking and active experimentation.

Personal development

Depending on the type of personality, someone steps into the learning circle.

  • Doers like to tackle. Give them some concrete instructions and they will get to work right away. Active experimentation is their credo. You can solve problems by trying things out.
  • Thinkers first choose to collect information. They link new knowledge to what they already know. Thinkers only get to work when they understand what they are doing.
  • Dreamers don’t like quick decisions. They take their time and like to look at things from different angles. As a result, they often see different solutions that are all worth considering.
  • Decision-makers take a pragmatic approach. They like to make a step-by-step plan and then try things out. They are more practical and not so interested in theory.

Taking advantage of Kolb’s learning styles

It is a lot easier for trainers when they have an idea whether the trainee is a doer, thinker, dreamer or decision maker. This allows them to develop person-oriented learning material.

You have to convince the decision maker of its practical usefulness. The thinker benefits most from an intellectual challenge. You do the doer a favor by stimulating him with a practical assignment.

The dreamer gets excited when confronted with different visions to solve a problem.

When employees can learn in a style that suits their own personality, they will be more motivated and achieve better results. Learning something new does not happen in a forced way, but, as it were, automatically.

What Is Experiential Learning? - Institute for Experiential Learning

Also read:

25 questions to get to know yourself better…

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

What is the ADKAR model

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

ADKAR model: This article explains Jeff Hiatt ‘s ADKAR model in a practical way. After reading you will understand the fundamentals of this powerful change management tool.

ADKAR – Pathos Leadershop

What is the ADKAR model?

Change in organizations usually provokes resistance among employees. The ADKAR model offers a solution to identify why changes are difficult to achieve and do not always work well.

Change management is successfully achieved on the basis of five elements, which together form the acronym ADKAR. The letters stand for Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability and Reinforcement .

This model was developed by Jeff Hiatt in 2006 and was introduced into practice by Prosci , a recognized change management consultancy and training firm.

The ADKAR model is primarily intended as a coaching tool to help and assist employees during change processes within organizations.

Awareness

All five elements of this model can be applied sequentially as well as stacked. When changing, it is important that everyone is aware of the reason.

Employees naturally resist when it comes to change. It is therefore necessary to make them aware of the need for change.

Good and extensive knowledge is a precondition for implementing the change. Learning new skills and managing different behavior is part of this.

After implementation, it is necessary that the change is reinforced in order to prevent relapse to old behavior.

The five building blocks of the ADKAR model

In the model, five building blocks serve as a basis for successful change management:

Consciousness (Awareness)

Employees must become aware of the necessity of the change.

The first building block revolves around possibly the most important question: why is change necessary and desired? Without a clear answer to this question including motivation, staff will have great difficulty accepting the change and joining the movement.

Effectively communicating these reasons, from different perspectives, is necessary to create awareness. Preferably, the communication consists of practical examples about why employees will find the planned initiatives useful and why it will benefit their work.

An important method of achieving this is by opening an open dialogue between employees and management. It is important to make them think about the change, ask questions and share their own experiences and examples.

It is also possible to conduct interviews with customers or employees in which they explain their perspectives and make a plea for the change. These interviews can be filmed and shown to larger groups of employees.

Desire

Employees must be given the desire to participate in the change and fully support it.

The second building block revolves around motivating employees. Companies can’t tell their employees how they should feel about something, but they can motivate them. There are a number of specific reasons why people feel resistance to change. For example, studies show that some employees can embrace change if they feel heard and treated well throughout the change process.

A common mistake is therefore to invite employees for a dialogue about change and then not organize anything anymore. In many cases, employees find it useless to write down ideas on paper that they don’t hear about later.

It is therefore essential to organize regular communication and feedback moments. In this way involvement is stimulated, which helps to accept change.

Realization (Knowledge)

Knowledge of the change process makes it clear to employees what the (end) goal of the change is.

Learning does not happen in a closed space. Whatever knowledge employees have, it is important that they share knowledge and reflect knowledge in an organized learning process. In this way they give meaning to what has been learned and help each other to benefit from newly acquired knowledge.

This is also known as social learning. Social learning is the key to spreading knowledge in a natural way. Organizations should not just send their employees on a course, but should actively let them deal with new knowledge.

Power (Ability)

The ability to learn new skills and manage different behavior makes the change more acceptable.

What prevents employees from contributing to change? Sometimes it is because they feel they are not part of the change. By listening to employees, companies can identify and remove barriers. Ask them how things are going and how they experience their position.

Encourage people to believe in their own abilities and give them recognition. Even when they fail, because then it is more likely that they will learn from their mistakes. It’s hard for employees to show their weaknesses in the workplace, so remind them not to be ashamed of seeking help.

Reinforcement

By ratifying the change, it is clear to all employees that there is no going back.

To support the change, an organization must encourage employees and managers to keep talking about the progress of the initiatives, celebrate milestones and continue to share success stories. Provide employees with a platform to easily share stories.

ADKAR model : two dimensions

Every change takes place on two dimensions; the organization and the employees. Change is only successful when change takes place on both dimensions simultaneously.

If it appears that stagnation is taking place in the model at one of the building blocks, it is good to take action very specifically on this element. This goal-oriented approach focuses on that element with the highest chance of success.

The model not only helps to determine in advance which steps must be taken to achieve the right goal, but also to identify afterwards why changes do not work well. This evaluation moment is especially valuable in order to make the change successful.

Advantages of the ADKAR model

There are many benefits associated with using the ADKAR model. Some of these benefits are listed below.

  1. The ADKAR model offers a practical and simple approach to change management. Many change models only prescribe change in group dynamics or organizational change, but are difficult to apply.
  2. ADKAR is an out-of-the-box approach, but it doesn’t require companies to reinvent the wheel. It is a turnkey solution for companies that want change.
  3. ADKAR has been around for a long time and has been extensively tested. It is one of the most widely used and popular change management models.
  4. ADKAR comes with a lot of explanation, training and support. The company behind ADKAR, Prosci, offers good and comprehensive training for reasonable prices.

Disadvantages of the ADKAR model

Obviously, there are also some drawbacks associated with using the ADKAR model.

  1. The ADKAR model ignores the need for companies to develop a vision for the long-term development of their change plans.
  2. The ADKAR model is better suited for smaller change proposals because it focuses only on the human aspect of change. This is not enough to achieve large-scale change.

Now it’s your turn

What do you think? How do you apply the ADKAR model? Do you recognize the building blocks for a good elaboration of the ADKAR model or are there more / others? What do you think are other success criteria or factors that can contribute to the application of the ADKAR model?

Share your knowledge and experience via the comment box at the bottom of this article.

You may also like to read:

This is how you start automating your marketing (sharing 5 tips)

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail